Comparison

Caver vs Dragos

Caver compared to Dragos Platform for OT/ICS buyers. Where Dragos's decade of OT focus wins, where unified IT plus OT in one stack wins.

Dragos is the established OT/ICS security platform. A decade of industrial focus, deep ICS-vendor relationships, well-known threat research (the WorldView intel, the CHERNOVITE / VOLTZITE attributions), and a large federal customer base. If you’re an OT-only buyer evaluating OT-only platforms, Dragos is the incumbent.

Caver answers a different procurement question: do you want one stack that covers IT and OT, or two stacks? caver-industrial extends the same Caver lakehouse SIEM with passive industrial-protocol decoders and OT-aware detection content, so OT and IT events land in one analytics tier with one query language.

At a glance

Dragos Platform Caver (caver-industrial + caver-collector)
Buyer focus OT-only specialist. IT and OT in one stack (convergence buyer).
Deployment model Appliance and virtual sensor; vendor-managed and on-prem options. On-prem lakehouse, air-gap friendly. caver-collector pipeline on the OT side, caver storage and analytics on the IT side.
Passive protocol coverage Broad and mature: 25+ industrial protocols including DNP3, Modbus, IEC 60870-5-104, IEC 61850 GOOSE/SV, S7Comm, EtherNet/IP, OPC-UA, BACnet, plus vendor-specific dialects. Active decoders for BACnet/IP, S7Comm, IEC 60870-5-104, DNP3, Modbus TCP, EtherNet/IP, OPC-UA. Roadmap aligns with the published industrial integration order.
Asset inventory First-class, mature, with vendor-firmware mapping. Native asset inventory built from passive decoder output and partner ingestion.
Industrial threat intel WorldView intel program with named-threat attribution and quarterly releases. Curated TI feeds focused on industrial CVEs and adversary TTPs. Updates daily through the Caver content pipeline rather than quarterly.
Framework alignment NIST 800-82, IEC 62443, NERC CIP. NIST 800-82, IEC 62443. Roadmap includes NERC CIP content.
IT-side coverage Limited; integrates with IT SIEMs rather than being one. Native. Caver is an IT SIEM that also covers OT. No second stack.
AI security visibility None. caver-aisec: prompt-injection detection, AI Observatory, NIST AI 100-2 + OWASP feeds.
Query languages Platform-native UI and queries. SPL, KQL, SQL natively against the Parquet lake. AI agents over MCP.
Pricing model Enterprise procurement; per-asset and per-site licensing typical. Transparent per-deployment license-key. Industrial pricing marketed Custom.
Update cadence Quarterly platform releases plus intel updates. Daily content updates through the pipeline.

Where Dragos wins

Where Caver wins

How to decide

For OT-only shops with a mature, separately-staffed OT security program and no plans to converge with IT: Dragos is the safer pick. A decade of OT focus is hard to argue with.

For shops where the same team owns IT and OT, or where the IT SOC is being asked to cover OT events as part of the convergence push: Caver removes a stack. One query language, one analytics tier, one license.

For shops doing a competitive bake-off: the honest comparison is depth-of-OT vs breadth-of-coverage. Dragos is deeper on OT specifically. Caver is broader across IT, OT, and AI security in one place. Map that to which procurement question is louder for you.

For shops where industrial pricing is a budget blocker: Caver’s per-deployment license-key is published, and industrial pricing is quoted Custom but built on the same transparent model rather than enterprise per-asset arithmetic.

Talk to us about scoping — or read about caver-industrial.

Want to try Caver against your own data?

Tell us a bit about your stack and we will scope a pilot against your real telemetry. Most evaluations are querying inside a week.

Trademark notice. Splunk, splunkd, SPL, Splunk Enterprise Security, ITSI, UBA, and SOAR are trademarks of Splunk Inc. (a Cisco company). Microsoft Sentinel, KQL, Azure, and Defender are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. Elastic, Elasticsearch, and Kibana are trademarks of Elasticsearch B.V. All other product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. Use on this page is nominative, to describe interoperability, federation, and competitive comparison. No affiliation, sponsorship, or endorsement is claimed or implied.

© Etairos.ai / RedEye Security. caver landing · pricing · compare